Um NÃO mais redondo que os números

Acabei de ver, no cinco dias, a rejeição ao tal plano.

Nancy Pelosi, não podia ser mais clara. Ou podia?

Para que não venham depois dizer que não ouviram . . .

(…) When was the last time anyone ever asked you for seven hundred billion dollars? It’s a staggering figure. And many questions had arisen from that request. And we have been hearing, I think, a very informed debate on all sides of this issue here today.
(…)
Seven hundred billion dollars, a staggering number, but only a part of the cost, of the fail Bush economic policies to our country. (…) Anything goes economic policy. (…) They claim to be free market advocates, when it’s really an anything goes mentality. No regulation, no supervision, no discipline. And if you fail you will have a golden parachute and the taxpayer will bail you out. Those days are over. The party is over in that respect.
Democrats believe in a free market. We know that it can create jobs, it can create wealth, it can create many good things in our economy. But in this case (…) it has created, not jobs, not capital, it has created chaos.
(…)
But it wasn’t just the money that was alarming. It was the nature of the legislation. It gave the secretary of treasure (…) unlimited powers, latitude to do all kind of things and specifically prohibited (…) a revue of any other federal administrative agency. (…) Another aspect (…) that was alarming is that they gave the secretary (...)

Não se consegue ouvir o resto. Quais os outros aspectos alarmantes do "pacote de salvamento" . . . por mim acho que já chega.

"(...) foram muitos os eleitos nas duas bancadas que mantiveram as dúvidas sobre a eficácia ou a legitimidade desta intervenção estatal no sector privado." (Público)